Multiple “Choice” Questions

 Mike Adams

• Morally speaking, is having an abortion really just like picking a scab?

• If abortion is not murder because the fetus is not a person than why make it “safe, legal, and rare”?

• Do you have a similar desire to make scab-picking safe, legal, and rare”?

• If a woman were raped and got pregnant, which one would you kill a) the baby, b) the rapist, or c) both?

• Are you comfortable with the fave that “a” is the only answer you may choose according to (the present interpretation of) the Constitution?

• Abortion advocated frequently focus on the size of the fetus. Why is that relevant?

• Do tall people have more rights than short people?

• Do men have superior rights relative to women given that men are, on average, larger that women?

• Is fetal lack of self-awareness a justification for abortion?

• Is murder permissible when the victim is sleeping unaware of the surrounding environment?

• Dose the high infant mortality rate in Third World nations justify infanticide in Third World nations?

• Does the spontaneous termination of life by nature justify the intentional termination of life by man?

• Are humans beings inherently more valuable than other animals such as dogs?

• Should a woman abort a baby because it may be expensive and time consuming to raise a child adulthood?

• What give human beings more value that dogs?

• Should a woman be able to kill a puppy because it may be expensive an time consuming to feed and care for a dog?

• Is it morally permissible for a woman to have an abortion if she has pets? In other words, is it wrong to decline care for her baby while providing care for animals?

• Does secular humanism assume that humans are inherently different from other life form? If not, why is it called humanism?

• Should religious leaders interject their religiously-based opposition to the death penalty in debates over public policy?

• Should religious leaders interject their religiously-based opposition to abortion in debates over public policy? If you answered “no” to this question and“yes” to the previous question please explain your inconsistency

• Dose the “right to choose” comes from man or God?

• If man grants rights can he also take them away?

• It have been said (by three Supreme Court Justices) that “At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.” Dose that mean a woman can define a baby's rights out of existence because a woman is more powerful than a baby?

• Or dose that mean a man, can define a woman's rights out of existence because, in a patriarchal society, a man is more powerful than a woman?